23 Jul 2026


This is a link-enhanced version of an article that first appeared in The Economic Times.
Article Overview:
The article examines Meta’s mistaken suspension of CJP spokesperson Saurav Das’ WhatsApp account and the broader allegations of content blocking and platform moderation. It also highlights the increasing use of government requests for online content regulation and the evolving interpretation of Section 69A of the Information Technology Act.
Our Partner, Nikhil Narendran, shared his perspective. Here’s what he had to say:
“If you look at the transparency reports published by major platforms, the overall trend is fairly clear. Government requests for content removal and access restrictions have increased over the years, suggesting a much more active use of content regulation than we saw a few years ago.”
The provision is increasingly being used in situations beyond what was originally contemplated when it was enacted, raising concerns that the government is stretching the scope of its powers under the Information Technology Act.
Download PDF
Deal: Trilegal advised Varthana Finance’s institutional investors on their proposed exit, as a part of Home Credit India Finance’s proposed INR 967 crore acquisition of Varthana Finance

Deal: Trilegal advised on Belrise Industries’ INR 17,000 million QIP

Can children claim a share in property inherited by their father? Karnataka HC explains when they can—and cannot
Under the rules of the Bar Council of India, Trilegal is prohibited from soliciting work or advertising in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.trilegal.com, you acknowledge that:
We prioritize your privacy. Before proceeding, we encourage you to read our privacy policy, which outlines the below, and terms of use to understand how we handle your data:
For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.